Author\’s Note: This post is one in a series of posts that breaks down the 2010 Soccer MVP Tournament competition. Be sure to look at the final results to review how \’Inside\’ was crowned champion. What do you call this part of the foot? Please vote.
There sure is a lot of emphasis placed on shooting and scoring goals. And rightfully so. After all, if you don\’t shoot, you don\’t score, and if you don\’t score, you don\’t win games. Goals in soccer are equivalent to home runs in baseball, touchdowns in football, and slam dunks or buzzer-beating shots in basketball. It\’s what puts bodies in the stands and highlights on Fox Sports Report, Gol TV, and ESPN SportsCenter. The lack of goals is usually the #1 complaint voiced among sports fan when asked what\’s wrong with soccer. So players, please shoot, shoot often, and score!
The shooting discipline was divided into 3 categories: power, accuracy, and breadth. In what many will consider an upset, \’Inside\’ won this discipline as well.
Without a doubt, \’Laces\’ generated the most powerful shots. Besides being able to transfer the momentum of a pass or a cross to produce powerful shots, strong shots were also generated when shots were taken with the ball in a stationary position. \’Laces\’ was able to score some fantastic goals from 25-, 30-, or 35-yards out. Talk about a \’golazo\’.
\’Inside\’ came in a respectable second. On crosses, \’Inside\’ generated as much power as \’Laces\’ had. But it was not able to generate as much power from stationary or set-play shots. However, \’Inside\’ was able to score some amazing goals off of free kicks. Walls and great goalies were no match for a beautifully executed and well-positioned \’banana kick\’.
On several occasions, \’Outside\’ was able to generate the same velocity as \’Inside\’ had but only rarely. \’Bottom\’ was a non-factor.
\’Inside\’ excelled at accuracy. The same billiard table analogy I used for receiving the ball can again be applied. The flatter the surface, the more accurate the shot. On many crosses, \’Inside\’ simply had to stick out the foot and accurately redirect the ball into the net.
Accuracy is why penalty kicks and free kicks are taken with the inside-of-the-foot. A good penalty taker has to be able to hit any target inside the goal. With the inside-of-the-foot, the lower-left corner can be hit just as easily as the upper-right corner. The same holds true for direct free kicks. When David \’Bend-It-Like\’ Beckham shoots his free kicks, he always uses the inside-of-the-foot.
\’Outside\’ came in second because it was more able to consistently hit its targets than \’Laces\’. When \’Laces\’ made solid contact with the ball, it would usually go straight. However, when the ball did not make solid contact with the sweet spot on top-of-the foot, a spin or curve was introduced and the direction of the shot became more unpredictable. \’Bottom\’ was once again a non-factor.
Goalies are so good these days that it often takes incredibly precise shots to beat them. To be effective goal scorers, players need a foot surface that can give them many shooting options. The inside-of-the-foot does this and easily won this shooting subcategory. Several \’breadth\’ tests were used in determine the winner: penalty kicks and long-distance shots with defenders in the way.
Penalty takers try to disguise the direction of the penalty kick so the goalie is forced to guess where the ball will be kicked. Good goalies know that the position of the plant and the kicker\’s approach usually telegraph the placement of the kick. That is not the case with the inside-of-the-foot. Good penalty takers are able to place the plant foot in several positions and still hit all targets inside the goal (see image below).
The same is not true when using the top- or outside-of-the-foot. As illustrated below, these surfaces limit the part of the goal that can be targeted because the plant foot needs to be positioned just so in order to execute a good kick. Therefore, good goalies can usually predict where the ball will be kicked by concentrating on the position of the plant foot.
Long Distance Shots with Obstructions
Bending the ball around defenders is an extremely important skill for forwards and free-kicker takers to have. Once again, David Beckham is able to bend or curve a shot around or over walls that are set up to defend against the free kick. This skill also comes in handy on non-set plays. When a forward needs to avoid a defender from blocking a shot, a curved shot using the inside-of-the-foot will do the trick. Even when no defenders are present, forwards will curve a shot around a goalie\’s outstretched hands.
Shots with the top-of-the-foot generally go straight. If a defender is standing between the shooter and the goal, whether in a wall or in the run of play, there is a high percentage that the shot will be blocked. Shots with the outside-of-the-foot did give the kicker the ability to curve the ball around a defender, but unlike the inside, these shots had less spin.
In a surprise, \’Inside\’ won the shooting discipline. In terms of shooting \’accuracy\’ and \’breadth of shots\’, the inside-of-the-foot was the overwhelming winner. \’Inside\’ also did quite well in the \’power\’ category.